Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Pariatur nemo excepturi incidunt eius, vitae rerum, voluptatum distinctio nulla nostrum cumque ex neque inventore quae minus! Neque in quod animi perspiciatis.
Author: Julian Sefton-Green Full reference: Sefton-Green, J. (2011). Creative Agents: A Review and Research Project. Newcastle: Creativity, Culture and Education. Summary of key findings Creative Partnerships and Creative Agents: The key purpose of this research was to offer CCE a single overarching review of the work of Creative Agents framed within an analysis of salient concerns
Author: Tyler Denmead Institution: University of Cambridge Full reference: Denmead, T. (2011). ‘Being and becoming: elements of pedagogies described by three East Anglian creative practitioners’. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 6 (1): 57-66 Summary of key findings This small-scale research project aims to broaden understanding of creative practitioners’ pedagogies from their perspectives. A case study of
Author: Jonathan Bradshaw and Antonia Keung Institution: University of York Full reference: Bradshaw, J. and Keung, A. ‘Trends in child subjective well-being in the UK’ Journal of Children’s Services 6(1): 4-17 Summary of key findings This article uses British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) data to explore trends in the subjective well-being of young people aged
Author: Graham Allen MP Institution: HM Government Full reference: Allen, G. (2011) Early Intervention: The Next Steps. An Independent Report to HM Government. London: Cabinet Office Summary This report sets out a case for rebalancing of the approach to social problems towards an Early Years Intervention culture, emphasising primary prevention strategies. It discusses the science
Institution: The EPPI-Centre (Institute of Education, University of London) Summary of key findings One of three strands in the CASE review, this report covers in depth reviews of quantitative research on the learning impacts for young people, based on quantitative research. Quantitative research was specifically chosen in order to aid future analysis to derive economic
Author: Michael Raiber, Bryan L. Duke, Nancy H. Barry, Charlene E. Dell and Diane H. Jackson, with Executive Summary by Jean Hendrickson. Institution: University of Central Oklahoma Full reference: Raiber, M., Duke, B., Barry, N., Dell, C and Jackson, D. (2010) Oklahoma A+ Schools: What the Research Tells us: 2002 – 2007. Edmond, OK: Oklahoma
Author: Kate Oakley Institution: Visiting Professor in Innovation at the University of the Arts in London and at the Department of Cultural Policy and Management, City University Full reference: Oakley, K (2009) ‘Art Works’ – cultural labour markets: A literature review. London: Creativity, Culture and Education. Summary of key findings The review gives a flavour of
Author: Sam Frankel Institution: Institute of Education Full reference: Frankel, S. (2007) Researching Children’s Morality: developing research methods that allow children’s involvement in discourses relevant to their everyday lives. Childhoods Today, 1, (1), 1-25. (Online journal) Summary of key findings This article is concerned with ways in which children’s voices can be heard in debates about childhood
Report title: Social Capital and the Cultural sector: Literature Review prepared for the department of Culture, Media and Sport Author: Dr Siobhan Daly Institution: Centre of Civil Society, London School of Economics Full reference: Daly, S. (2005) Social Capital and the Cultural sector: Literature Review prepared for the department of Culture, Media and Sport. Centre
Author: Kathleen V. Hoover-Dempsey and Howard M. Sandler Institution: Vanderbilt University Full reference: Hoover-Dempsey, K. & Sandler, H.( 1997) ‘Why do parents become involved in their children’s education?‘ Review of Educational Research 67, 3-42 Summary of key findings This article reviews psychological theory and research critical to understanding why parents become involved in their children’s primary
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Pariatur nemo excepturi incidunt eius, vitae rerum, voluptatum distinctio nulla nostrum cumque ex neque inventore quae minus! Neque in quod animi perspiciatis.